
EQUITY
RELEASE – WHAT IS IT AND WHY MIGHT IT SUIT YOU?
The general term ‘equity release’ is used to
describe various products to access capital within a property and, in view of
recent events and product development both here and in the UK, it is worth
explaining the various interpretations, uses and (no small issue) the risk
associated with it.
The first point I would make is this. Accessing any
element of equity in your home should never, never be actioned lightly. In most
cases the property isn’t just any property; it is your home! To endanger your
future by accessing large hunks of capital in your home, perhaps capital that
can never be replaced IF something goes awry, will potential have dire
consequences for you and your family.
So you must always, always follow these golden
rules;
-
Consult with a solicitor, especially for complex
products. They will take an independent view on your behalf.
-
Discuss it with your family. What you are doing may
impact them and, you never know, they may be able to assist in some way!
-
ONLY use a regulated financial advisor for
product advice.
The last point is important as most products, in the
You can take that further. Many products in and
around general financial services are not regulated in
So, to the issue in hand! What is ‘Equity Release’
and how might the various products help you?
1)
In recent years, it has become apparent that, as
with many other parts of the world on the back of increasing property values,
that valuable equity can be accessed and used by the property owners for
various reasons. Invariably, this has translated into a burst of new products
via a variety of mortgages for debt consolidation, freeing funds to build
property portfolios and, in particular (and this is where the phrase is
normally associated) for elderly folks who need capital to improve their
lifestyle, perhaps by investing that withdrawn capital for income.
Let me first quickly cover off standard remortgages
to release equity to debt consolidate and invest in other property. These tend
to be based on affordability i.e. the client will have an income and be able to
afford monthly repayments. For debt consolidation, total monthly outgoings will
be reduced (that is the sole reason for effecting the remortgage) whilst the
new property investment will likely have a rental income when let, and that
will pay for the cost of the new mortgage.
The products that are used for real Equity Release (i.e.
for elderly clients needing capital or income) fall into 2 camps;
1)
‘Pure’ Equity Release, referred to as Lifetime
Mortgages.
2)
Home Reversions
Lifetime Mortgages, a rather obscure title invented
by the Financial Services Authority as part of their regulation of the mortgage
industry in October 2004, are simple to understand. The borrower takes a
mortgage in the normal way, generally limited to a percentage according to age,
but with no need for proof of income. The mortgage risk is taken based upon the
expectation that house values in the
Reversions are a little more complex and, frankly,
of greater concern because a) the products are not (yet) regulated by the FSA
and b) the owner of the property is effectively handing such ownership over to
the would-be lender (buyer). I personally have never liked these products, but
I have to say in their defence that they do have their uses.
As an example as to why I prefer the ‘straight’
Lifetime mortgage option, I will explain a very new product that has just been
launched in the
Let’s put some numbers on this example. If the
property was valued at £100,000 when the original £30,000 was advanced and, 15
years later, it is valued at, say £200,000, the 71% for their part is now worth
£142,000 for an advance of £30,000. That is a compounded growth rate of circa 11%.
Not bad business I would say and I think I am being a little conservative on my
expectation for £200,000!
The
criticism that is levied with these products, Lifetime mortgage and Home
Reversions, rotate around the risk to the client if
market property trends go against them. Property prices can fall! But also
there is some concern that inheritances are being spent and that is a whole
different can of worms. I am not brave enough to get into that issue! And
lastly, where capital is withdrawn from a property to put into investments to
generate an income, again there is the fear that the investment will fail and
the capital be lost (or at least reduced) and hence, the home threatened as a
consequence.
All very real fears but, sometimes, a little over
done in my opinion! The CRITICAL issue is this; if the client has a genuine
problem i.e. they cannot live within their existing means, then something has
to be done. Life is a risk so, what is needed at the outset, is a full and
frank exchange of views, hopes, fears, wants and needs, and an understanding of
risks, preferably with the client and his family or eventual benefactors, to
decide what route and product to take.
2)
In
But, for normal purposes (such as debt
consolidation, general capital raising and for property portfolio building) we
have pretty much all the tools to do the job. ‘Interest Only’ (which is the
key fundamental for any property related transaction in
But, for ‘pure’ Equity Release products, especially
an equivalent to Lifetime Mortgages as explained above, we are not even in the
starting blocks let alone being out of them on the road to full market
competition.
The closest we can get to this is where a mortgage
is placed on the property, perhaps an element of cash released to the client,
but where the bulk of the funds are invested a) to meet the mortgage debt in
its entirety and b) for an income. These are often referred to as ‘Equity
Release’ products here in
Subject to the usual scrutiny as to product provider
and risk/reward attitudes, these products can achieve the desired end which
should always be to improve the lifestyle of the client. The criticism of these
products comes from a) how they are sold (i.e. are they sold for the right
reason) and b) are the risks fully understood by the client. At the end of the
day remember the investment capital should not be under threat at all and
preferably guaranteed. But house prices cannot be guaranteed and neither can
investment returns, so very careful calculations and judgements have to be made
to determine whether such risks are understood and are acceptable. So caution
is the key and, to repeat a suggestion made in the last issue, such decisions
should really be taken with the end beneficiaries to an estate. Why? Because we
all want to avoid politics, especially inter family ones, and there may be
other options open which avoid or mitigate the risks suggested.
For example, as part of the process of general
financial planning that we at Rose FP take on for our clients, it is not unusual
to come across the issue of ‘capital
rich but income poor’ clients. Translated that means that the clients want to
improve their lifestyle, but also want to retain a balance against the
preservation of capital for their eventual beneficiaries (children, grand
children). I have found that the use of the same beneficiaries as mortgage co-applicants
or even acting as a ‘guarantor’, in conjunction with the use of long term ‘interest
only’ products, can put into place a natural ‘inheritance plan’ where the cost
to the client (the parents or grandparents) today is affordable and
controllable (perhaps even zero) and the inheritance of the beneficiaries
assured and understood. What is necessary is to be prepared to have a full and
frank conversation, and to have an open mind to ideas that you may not want to
hear!
So, in summary, whilst we are not yet blessed with
the depth of product that the
Mark
Mountney, the proprietor of Rose Financial Planning, (see www.rosefp.com), is a specialist mortgage
brokerage and Independent Financial Advisor. He is a fully qualified mortgage
and financial adviser in the